Need Help?

Need more information? Call our office and we will connect you with a team member.

(+257)-79 700 321

info@bmil.org

View FAQ

BMIL Canons for facilitating Management Innovation between universities and industry.

  1. Administrative mechanisms can impede vision-centered team building.
  2. Toxic work environment breeds ambiguous employee relationships.
  3. Team based collaboration mechanisms sustain emergent social order.
  4. The university shapes the manager’s culture and character.
  5. Business schools are not the catalysts of management innovation, but rather, educate management tyrants that forget their fiduciary duty of loyalty to the corporation.
  6. The institutional traditions of business schools at universities need to evolve.
  7. The tradition of mutually exclusive academic and industry research-practice inhibits a management innovation culture.
  8. Incentivizing purposeful idea generation establishes existential ties between research (academia)and practice (industry).
  9. Management innovation based on collaboration incentivizes development of new ideas and theories.
  10. An effective Management Innovation Ecosystem constitutes an interactive environment.
  11. Paced collaboration interactions on management innovation require frequent redefinition of effective research to ensure they act in harmony with the imperative of relevance.
  12. Effective engagement of the leadership in the university and in industry partners facilitates management innovation.
  13. Incentivizing faculty to engage with industry can increase management innovation research projects.
  14. Dynamic contributions result when sustainable university and industry cooperation occurs.

Our BMIL Canons...

… are expected to generate thought and invoke responses for either challenging the accuracy of the cannon, or for better articulating its potential effect to industry.

Comments are welcome. 🥳

Common Question for this project

Since Socrates, self-knowledge and self-awareness are at the heart of healthy relations whether for individuals or for organizations. Unfortunately, university and industry have hardly received sufficient incentives to invest in mutual awareness and the opportunity of cooperating with each other (Newman, 1852). The new era marked by technological advancements has intensified the call for renewal for both business schools and industry to become forces for good for all. The imperative of raising management innovators inside the academia and industry as skilled, bold, and action-oriented people that disrupt both universities and industry has become a common and irresistible priority. Beyond their spheres of influence, management innovators have the mandate of inspiring strong understanding of context-focused innovation, undertaking bold innovation policy reforms, building cross-sector platforms for idea-based market for innovation, incentivizing companies' own R&D efforts for market, and leading the reinvention of Burundi's university and industry to meet the universal development pace of every living system and society.

Fully self-aware participants from universities and industries are keen to invest in mutual discovery, to share on their exclusive vignette, to play an active role in designing, investing in, and running long-term collaborative projects. By offering each other platforms to come in and lecture on the MI findings they have experimented with, university and industry participants will have improved MI sustainability through shared vision of raising management innovators as disciplined people, capable of disciplined thought through critical thinking, and disciplined action.

Networking through scientific/professional conferences and constructive encounters with instrumental actors in advanced contexts of university and industry cooperation. BMIL coordinates a number of experts in their areas ranging from setting organizational learning systems, digital strategy, data analytics, management innovation culture audit and design, lean systems, foreign direct investment, etc. Each of these experts offer invaluable insights for moving systemic barriers to organizational reinvention for future success.

Constituting a group of trusted confidants: Both industry and university face unprecedented problems that fascinate them prompting them to generate good, purposeful, and novel ideas. The complexity of their environment put them in front of big problems requiring creative responses, while unlocking constructivist skepticism as a leverage for intellectual honesty, transparency, and professional humility as the most sought qualities for management innovation. Only by learning to behave as honest, transparent, and humble university and industry participants can harness.

Incentivizing faculty to become the cornerstone of MI research projects: It is not enough to publish to remain alive. The complexity of our times has added emphasis on research to produce revolutionary and disruptive knowledge instead preferring incremental knowledge production. This allows us to build reputable institutions driving on the emergence of new markets, accurate use of organized and systematic data, faculty with vast work experience in the industry.

Mutual definition of research significance for inclusive research impact: In ill-equipped context in innovation, societal effectiveness is an inherent demand for institutions. The threat of perishing from failure to publish becomes more serious once put into research usefulness. BMIL facilitates this through cooperation between industry and university participants in the definition of research problems, research design and execution, and dissemination, making publishing for exclusive tenure track record in academia an insufficient goal.

Development of cooperative dynamic capabilities through greater faculty differentiation with more integration of people with industry experience, awareness of new and untraditional competitors in their respective industries, and wider fundraising networks for running research with societal impact.

Popular Services

Design innovation-conscious programs

Upgrading professors' ability to lecture management innovation-sensitive classes hardly suffices if academic programs and policies fail to adapt.

Unlearn-Learn- relearn management innovation teaching methodologies

Learning from transdisciplinary methodologies for educating bold yet humble, honest, and transparent people who reinvent organizations into entrepreneurial ecosystems as flexible professionals. They constantly push the boundaries of organizational reinvention by translating it into an endless source of entrepreneurial opportunity.